told this was an act of terror, and the white house has come out and said, well, that should be obvious, that it was an act of terror. is this a law enforcement matter now, or is this a homeland security matter? >> it should be a military matter. and, um, for the life of me i don't understand why it's regarded as a law enforcement matter, if it is, in fact. megyn: well, because we were told last week they came out and said it's spontaneous, the protests, and the state department said i can no longer comment on it because the fbi's conducting an investigation, and, therefore, if you have questions, bring them to the department of justice, the same department of justice you used to run. but they said the d. of justice isn't going the talk to you either. then we started to get leaks about who was really behind this, and it wasn't spontaneous, and this was a planned terror attack, and there was some heads up about it, and now they come out and say, okay, it was a terror act. does that shift it? no longer doj, now this is a military thing that the pentagon should be talking to us about?